Saturday, May 22, 2010

David’s Definitions for July 2010

Effect, Affect

A reader asked me to define these two words and explain how to use them. They're closely related words, very similarly spelled and pronounced, so it's easy to see why people get them confused. Affect is the verb, the action word. "The tragic story affected him deeply." Effect is the result. It's the noun, the thing. "The tragic story had a powerful effect on him." Perhaps it would help to think of the word effective. Something is effective if it has an effect. Unfortunately, and to make things more confusing, there are a couple of cases where the situation is reversed.  Effect does have one use as a verb: to bring something about, to cause something to happen. "The prisoner effected his escape by jumping from the police car." And affect has one use as a noun, meaning one's mental state. Fortunately, both of these uses are rare in ordinary English. Affect can also be used as a verb in the sense of "pretend": "He affected an air of cynicism." I think that use is rather old fashioned, though. I hope the effect of all of this is to leave you less confused, rather than more.

(Will be published in the July 2010 issue of Denver's Community News.)

I'm collecting all of these at:
http://www.dvorkin.com/davidsdefs.html

9 comments:

Charles said...

this blog post effected me deeply....

oh... wait....

David said...

Heh, heh.

Charles said...

that was a thinly veiled "courtesy laugh", i suspect....

David said...

Not at all. British upbringing. For me, that was a guffaw.

Charles said...

my pride is once again saved from peril!

Chris said...

I want to print this post out and hang it all over town. Schools, libraries -- everywhere. For some reason, effect/affect confusion always sets my teeth on edge.

David said...

There are quite a few common confusions that set my teeth on edge. That may be why I now have so many crowns.

Lay/lie is one of them. And whom instead of who.

Leonore Dvorkin said...

As we were discussing this morning, David, I also hate hearing "whomever" when it should be "whoever" (for the subject of a clause). And nowadays, you always hear "staunch" instead of "stanch." Just this morning, I heard the radio reporter talking about "staunching" the flow of oil in the Gulf. I don't think I have heard "stanch" used in a long, long time.

David said...

It's curious that the spelling is differentiated in the same way as gantlet/gauntlet.

I can't think of another example.